My thoughts on textbooks, learning and iPads

Go back to traditional textbooks, says Education Minister Elizabeth Truss, because all that differentiation is a waste of time! In essence this was the message from Miss Truss following the publication of an OECD sponsored report which stated teachers in England spend more time preparing materials for lessons than their colleagues in other countries. And the UK is still languishing (relatively speaking) in Mathematics and English in PISA, that oft-quoted league table of attainment which casts such a long shadow over participating countries.

Textbooks appear to be king in Miss Truss’ argument because they provide core knowledge which every student should have and clearly is not being addressed through current pedagogy. Indeed we should be learning from the pedagogy which pertains in China and Japan where textbook-led lessons are the norm: “The top performers in international tests, like Shanghai and Japan, are adept at building on years of experience, at learning across the system. Schools use textbooks which children can take home to use for homework.,” Miss Truss said. Interestingly the Minister is critical of the practice whereby teachers prepare different lesson plans for groups of children in the same class – in her view the same textbook should ensure that all children achieve the standard required.

Textbooks are an interesting concept. How can one book address the learning needs of children across a range of ability? What Miss Truss alludes to are cultures of instruction where young people sit passively in lessons in large teaching groups working hard to understand the content being delivered to them. In this context a textbook makes sense – you didn’t get it first time? Take the textbook home and work it out for yourself before you return to class. Arguably this is the ultimate in independent learning. It is important therefore to note that governments in China and Japan are themselves reflecting on pedagogical practice. There are real concerns that whilst successfully educating high performing students, these same young people struggle when challenged to be creative in their approach to learning. And there are real concerns about the level of anxiety among young people in China. Back in 2011 these concerns were being publicly voiced:
“In the long run, for us to become a strong country, we need talent and great creativity,” Xiong Bingqi, an education expert at Shanghai Jiao Tong University told the Los Angeles Times in 2011. “And right now, our educational system cannot accomplish this.” In fact reform of the Chinese system of education has already begun.

So the traditional textbook as a silver bullet, although enticing, is not the way forward. Young people may learn for the tests from textbooks but this does not necessarily mean they can think independently. Which takes us back to the English pedagogical approach. And I have a suggestion which is radical but I believe would make a real difference. Just imagine if every young person had an iPad. This device is a platform for access to iTunesU and iBooks – the former offering teacher-curated access to digital resources and the latter a turbo-charged book created by the teacher for their learners. This digitisation of learning answers Miss Truss’ desire for every child to have a textbook as well as the propensity of teachers in this country to ensure every child in their classroom is engaged, inspired and challenged whatever their ability. Certainly in our school we are piloting the use of such enriched resources and already can see that access to a range of resources beyond the capacity of a traditional textbook is making a real difference to the learning environment. This is real independent learning – students engage with the digital material in ways which are meaningful for them.

Expensive solution? Yes. But what price do we place on education? As the late Nelson Mandela said: “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” Surely this should be motivation enough.

5 thoughts on “My thoughts on textbooks, learning and iPads

  1. Pingback: My thoughts on textbooks, learning and iPads | Teachers Blog

  2. Mark Marcantonio

    I switched over to a PDF version of the textbook for my 6th grade ancient history students. The students had access to them on any device. All academic and attitudinal indicators show that the switch benefitted students.

    Reply
  3. Crispin Weston (@crispinweston)

    Hello Tricia,

    I started to write a response to this post but my response because a post, which is at http://bit.ly/1iMqFgr.

    In brief, I think you slightly caricature Liz Truss’ position. Her main argument is about not reinventing the wheel, which I think is a very strong one.

    The argument against differentiation (which was not the primary point being made) might sound barmy but is in fact stronger than it appears. I don’t think we should demonise differentiation – but recognise that it is a two-edged sword that needs to be used with care.

    Finally, I don’t think it is a satisfactory riposte to arguments based on the important evidence brought to us by PISA to say that we don’t want to ape China or Korea. I quite agree we don’t – but that doesn’t mean we can’t learn from them.

    In my view, the use of the word “textbook” causes confusion and the way ahead is to exploit digital technology, not to return to the days of reading round the class!

    Thanks, Crispin.

    Reply
  4. Andrew Hampton

    One of the key factors we might learn from Singapore if we accept the Pisa test rankings (which I tend not to) is that in that country education is not regarded as a political football with changes every two minutes. Their maths curriculum is established over decades of sharing good practice and allowing teachers to hone their methods. So there is a deep irony in ‘let’s be like singapore’ when actually their model is based on ‘leave us alone’.

    Reply
  5. l. tuason

    Textbooks vs. Technology
    Differentiated Instruction is a powerful device for learning especially for kindergarten. We need to reach and discover each child potential through his/her interests and needs. Now a day, students are more engaged in learning through interactive games, songs and stories. If using technology is one of the ways and means to reach out our students rather than using textbook which children find interesting only when it is a picture text or a big book for young learners.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s